COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth? Part 5 – COVID “vaccines”

The following is a segment of a reprint of Dr. Russell Blaylock’s article on Surgical Neurology International.

DANGERS OF THE VACCINES ARE INCREASINGLY REVEALED BY SCIENCE

While most researchers, virologists, infectious disease researchers, and epidemiologists have been intimidated into silence, a growing number of high-integrity individuals with tremendous expertise have come forward to tell the truth. That is, these vaccines are deadly.

Most new vaccines must undergo extensive safety testing for years before being approved. New technologies, such as the mRNA and DNA vaccines, require a minimum of 10 years of careful testing and extensive follow-up. These new so-called vaccines were “tested” for only two months, and then the results of these safety tests were and continue to be kept secret.

Serious Adverse reactions

Testimony before Senator Ron Johnson by several who participated in the two-month study indicates that virtually no follow-up of the participants of the pre-release research was ever done.[67]

Complaints of complications were ignored, and despite promises by Pfizer that Pfizer would pay all medical expenses caused by the “vaccines,” these individuals stated that none were paid.[66] Some medical expenses exceed 100,000 dollars.

An example of the deception by Pfizer, and the other makers of mRNA vaccines, is the case of 12-year-old Maddie de Garay, who participated in the Pfizer vaccine pre-release safety study. At Sen. Johnson’s presentation with the families of the vaccine injured, her mother told of her child’s recurrent seizures, that she now uses a wheelchair, must be tube-fed, and suffers permanent brain damage. On the Pfizer safety evaluation submitted to the FDA, her only side effect is listed as having a “stomachache.” Each person submitted similar horrifying stories.

Systemic spread of the shots

The Japanese resorted to a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) lawsuit to force Pfizer to release its secret biodistribution study. Pfizer wanted it kept secret because it demonstrated that Pfizer lied to the public and the regulatory agencies about the fate of the injected vaccine contents (the mRNA enclosed nano-lipid carrier). They claimed that it remained at the injection site (the shoulder) when their study found that it rapidly spread throughout the entire body by the bloodstream within 48 hours.

The study also found that these deadly nano-lipid carriers collected in very high concentrations in several organs, including the reproductive organs of males and females, the heart, the liver, the bone marrow, and the spleen (a major immune organ). The highest concentration was in the ovaries and the bone marrow. These nano-lipid carriers also were deposited in the brain.

Spike in cancers

Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist from Idaho, reported a dramatic spike in highly aggressive cancers among vaccinated individuals (not written in the Media). He found a frighteningly high incidence of highly aggressive cancers in vaccinated individuals, especially highly invasive melanomas in young people and uterine cancers in women.[26]

Other reports of activation of previously controlled cancers are also appearing among vaccinated cancer patients.[47] Thus far, no studies have been done to confirm these reports, but it is unlikely such studies will be done, at least studies funded by grants from the NIH.

The high concentration of spike proteins found in the ovaries in the biodistribution study could very well impair fertility in young women, alter menstruation, and could put them at an increased risk of ovarian cancer. The high concentration in the bone marrow could also put the vaccinated at a high risk of leukemia and lymphoma. The leukemia risk is problematic now that they have started vaccinating children as young as five.

No long-term studies have been conducted by any of these makers of Covid-19 vaccines, especially as regards the risk of cancer induction. Chronic inflammation is intimately linked to cancer induction, growth, and invasion and vaccines stimulate inflammation.

Cancer patients are being told they should get vaccinated with these deadly vaccines. This, in my opinion, is insane. Newer studies have shown that this type of vaccine inserts the spike protein within the nucleus of the immune cells (and most likely many cell types) and, once there, inhibits two essential DNA repair enzymes, BRCA1 and 53BP1, whose duty it is to repair damage to the cell’s DNA.[29] Unrepaired DNA damage plays a significant role in cancer.

There is a hereditary disease called xeroderma pigmentosum in which the DNA repair enzymes are defective. These unfortunate individuals develop multiple skin cancers and a very high incidence of organ cancer. Here we have a vaccine that does the same thing but less extensively.

One of the defective repair enzymes caused by these vaccines is called BRCA1, which is associated with a significantly higher incidence of breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men.

Lack of safety studies

It should be noted that no studies were ever done on several critical aspects of this type of vaccine.

They have never been tested for long-term effects.
They have never been tested for induction of autoimmunity.
They have never been adequately tested for safety during any stage of pregnancy.
No follow-up studies have been done on the babies of vaccinated women.
There are no long-term studies on the children of vaccinated pregnant women after their birth (Especially as neurodevelopmental milestones occur).
It has never been tested for effects on a long list of medical conditions:
- Diabetes
- Heart disease
- Atherosclerosis
- Neurodegenerative diseases
- Neuropsychiatric effects
- Induction of autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia
- Long-term immune function
- Vertical transmission of defects and disorders
- Cancer
- Autoimmune disorders

Previous experience with the flu vaccines demonstrates that the safety studies done by researchers and clinical doctors with ties to pharmaceutical companies were essentially poorly done or purposefully designed to falsely show safety and coverup side effects and complications. This was dramatically demonstrated with the previously mentioned phony studies designed to indicate that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were ineffective and too dangerous to use.[34,36,37]

These fake studies resulted in millions of deaths and severe health disasters worldwide. As stated, 80% of all deaths were unnecessary and could have been prevented with inexpensive, safe, repurposed medications with a long safety history among millions who have taken them for decades or even a lifetime.[43,44]

Ironically, those claiming they are responsible for protecting our health approved a poorly tested set of vaccines that has resulted in more deaths in less than a year of use than all the combined vaccines given over the past 30 years. Their excuse when confronted was—“we had to overlook some safety measures because this was a deadly pandemic.”[28,46]

Vaccine Injury Compensation

In 1986 President Reagan signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which gave blanket protection to pharmaceutical makers of vaccines against injury litigation by families of vaccine-injured individuals. In a 57-page opinion, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the vaccine companies, effectively allowing vaccine makers to manufacture and distribute dangerous, often ineffective vaccines to the population without fear of legal consequences.

The court did insist on a vaccine injury compensation system which has paid out only a minimal number of rewards to a large number of severely injured individuals. It is known that it is challenging to receive these awards. According to the Health Resources and Services Administration, since 1988, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has agreed to pay 3,597 awards among 19,098 vaccine-injured individuals, amounting to a total sum of $3.8 billion. This was before the introduction of the Covid-19 vaccines, in which the deaths alone exceeded all deaths related to all the vaccines combined over thirty years.

Right to try denied

In 2018 President Trump signed the “Right-To-Try” law, which allowed experimental drugs and all unconventional treatments to be used in cases of extreme medical conditions. As we have seen with the refusal of many hospitals and even blanket refusal by states to allow ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or any other unapproved “official” methods to treat even terminal Covid-19 cases, these nefarious individuals have ignored this law. (Part 4)

Strangely, they did not use this same logic or the law regarding ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, both of which had undergone extensive safety testing by over 30 clinical studies of high quality and given glowing reports on both efficacy and safety in numerous countries. In addition, we had a record of use for up to 60 years by millions of people using these drugs worldwide, with an excellent safety record. A group of compelling people in conjunction with pharmaceutical conglomerates didn’t want the pandemic to end and wanted vaccines as the only treatment option. Kennedy’s book makes this case using extensive evidence and citations.[14,32]

Pregnancy issues

Dr. James Thorpe, an expert in maternal-fetal medicine, demonstrates that these COVID-19 vaccines given during pregnancy have resulted in a 50-fold higher incidence of miscarriage than reported with all other vaccines combined.[28] When we examine his graph on fetal malformations, there was a 144-fold higher incidence of fetal malformation with the Covid-19 vaccines given during pregnancy compared to all other vaccines combined.

Yet, the American Academy of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology endorse the safety of these vaccines for all stages of pregnancy and among women breastfeeding their babies.

Notably, these medical specialty groups have received significant funding from Pfizer pharmaceutical company. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, just in the 4^th quarter of 2010, received a total of $11,000 from Pfizer Pharmaceutical company alone.[70] Funding from NIH grants is much higher.[20]

Scientists don’t bite the hand that gives grants

The best way to lose these grants is to criticize the funds’ source, products, or pet programs. Because he dared to question Fauci’s pet theory of AIDS caused by HIV, Peter Duesberg was no longer awarded any of the 30 grant applications he submitted after going public. Before this episode, as the leading authority on retroviruses worldwide, he had never been turned down for an NIH grant.[39] This is how the “corrupted” system works, even though much of the grant money comes from our taxes.

To be continued in Part 6.

Truth heals. Lies kill. Don’t Get Sick!

Knowledge about Covid-19 is rapidly evolving. Stay current by subscribing. Feel free to share and like.

Please consider donating to show your support if you find value in this website.

Related:

Reference: Blaylock RL. COVID UPDATE: What is the truth? Surg Neurol Int 2022;13:167.

Image credit: Wheelchair By Peachyeung316 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=113616320

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.