COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth? Part 7 – Autopsies

The following is a segment of a reprint of Dr. Russell Blaylock’s article on Surgical Neurology International. Links and emphasis are added.

WHY DID FAUCI WANT NO AUTOPSIES OF THOSE WHO DIED AFTER VACCINATION?

There are many things about this “pandemic” unprecedented in medical history. One of the most startling is that at the height of the pandemic, so few autopsies, especially total autopsies, were being done.

A mysterious virus was rapidly spreading around the world. A selected group of people with weakened immune systems were getting seriously ill, and many were dying. The one way we could rapidly gain the most knowledge about this virus—an autopsy- was being discouraged.

Guerriero noted that by the end of April 2020, approximately 150,000 people had died, yet there were only 16 autopsies performed and reported in the medical literature.[24] Among these, only seven were complete autopsies, the remaining nine being partial or by needle or incisional biopsy.

Only after 170,000 deaths by Covid-19 and four months into the pandemic were the first series of autopsies done, that is, more than ten. And only after 280,000 deaths and another month were the first large series of autopsies performed, some 80 in number.[22]

Sperhake, in a call for autopsies to be done without question, noted that the first complete autopsy reported in the literature along with photomicrographs appeared in a medico-legal journal from China in February 2020.[41,68] Sperhake expressed confusion as to why there was a reluctance to perform autopsies during the crisis, but he knew it was not coming from the pathologists.

The medical literature was littered with appeals by pathologists for more autopsies to be performed.[58] Sperhake further noted that the Robert Koch Institute (The German health monitoring system) at least initially advised against doing autopsies. He also knew that at the time, 200 participating autopsy institutions in the United States had done at least 225 autopsies among 14 states.

Some have claimed that this absence of autopsies was based on the government’s fear of infection among the pathologists. Still, a study of 225 autopsies on Covid-19 cases demonstrated only one COVID-19 infection among the pathologist, which was concluded to have been an infection contracted elsewhere.[19]

Guerriero ends his article calling for more autopsies with this observation: “Shoulder to shoulder, clinical and forensic pathologists overcame the obstructions of autopsy studies in Covid-19 victims and as a result of this generated valuable knowledge on the pathophysiology of the interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 and the human body, thus contributing to our understanding of the disease.”[24]

Why were the autopsies discouraged?

Suspicion concerning the worldwide reluctance of nations to allow complete post-mortem studies of Covid-19 victims may be based on the idea that it was more than by chance.

There are at least two possibilities that stand out. First, those leading the progression of this “non-pandemic” event into a perceived worldwide “deadly pandemic” were hiding an essential secret that autopsies could document. Namely, just how many of the deaths were actually caused by the virus?

To implement draconian measures, such as mandated mask-wearing, lockdowns, destruction of businesses, and eventually mandated forced vaccination, they needed vast numbers of COVID-19 infected dead. Fear would be the driving force for all these destructive pandemic control programs.

Elder et al., in their study, classified the autopsy findings into four groups.[22]

Certain Covid-19 death
Probably Covid-19 death
Possible Covid-19 death
Not associated with Covid-19, despite the positive test.

The reasons why autopsies were discouraged

What possibly concerned or even terrified the engineers of this pandemic was that autopsies just might, and did, show that a number of these so-called Covid-19 deaths, in truth, died of their comorbid diseases.

In the vast majority of autopsy studies reported, pathologists noted multiple comorbid conditions, most of which at the extremes of life could alone be fatal. Previously it was known that common cold viruses had an 8% mortality in nursing homes.

In addition, valuable evidence could be obtained from the autopsies that would improve clinical treatments and demonstrate the deadly effect of the CDC-mandated protocols all hospitals were required to follow, such as the use of respirators and the fatal, kidney-destroying drug remdesivir.

The autopsies also demonstrated accumulating medical errors and poor-quality care. The shielding of doctors in intensive care units from the eyes of family members inevitably leads to poorer quality care, as reported by several nurses working in these areas.[53–55]

Very few autopsies in COVID “vaccine” related deaths

As bad as all this was, the very same thing is being done in the case of Covid vaccine deaths—very few complete autopsies have been done to understand why these people died, that is, until recently.

Two highly qualified researchers, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a microbiologist and highly skilled expert in infectious disease, and Dr. Arne Burkhardt, a German pathologist who is a widely published authority having been a professor of pathology at several prestigious institutions, recently performed autopsies on 15 people have died after vaccination. What they found explains why so many are dying and experiencing organ damage and deadly blood clots.[5]

They determined that 14 of the fifteen people died as a result of the vaccines and not of other causes. Dr. Burkhardt, the pathologist, observed widespread evidence of an immune attack on the autopsied individuals’ organs and tissues— especially their heart.

This evidence included the extensive invasion of small blood vessels with massive numbers of lymphocytes, which cause extensive cell destruction when unleashed. Other organs, such as the lungs and liver, also suffered extensive damage. These findings indicate the vaccines were causing the body to attack itself with deadly consequences.

One can easily see why Anthony Fauci, public health officers, and all who are heavily promoting these vaccines publicly discouraged autopsies on the vaccinated who subsequently died.

One can also see that in the case of vaccines that were essentially untested before being approved for the general public, at least the regulatory agencies should have been required to monitor and analyze all serious complications carefully, and indeed, deaths linked to these vaccines. The best way to do that is with complete autopsies.

Are there spike proteins in the organs?

While we learned important information from these autopsies, special studies of the tissues of those who have died after vaccination for the presence of spike protein infiltration throughout the organs and tissues are needed. This would be critical information, as infiltration would severely damage all tissues and organs, especially the heart, brain, and immune system.

Animal studies have demonstrated this. In these vaccinated individuals, the spike proteins’ source would be the spike protein-producing mRNA’s injected nano lipid carriers of the spike protein-producing mRNA.

The government health authorities and pharmaceutical manufacturers of these “vaccines” do not want these critical studies done. The public would be outraged and demand an end to the vaccination program and prosecution of the involved individuals who covered this up.

The next part is the conclusion.

Truth heals. Lies kill. Don’t Get Sick!

Knowledge about Covid-19 is rapidly evolving. Stay current by subscribing. Feel free to share and like.

Please consider donating to show your support if you find value in this website.

Reference:

Blaylock RL. COVID UPDATE: What is the truth? Surg Neurol Int 2022;13:167.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.