Evidence of Intent to Harm

This article answers the question, What the heck is happening in the world?

Why are the COVID jabs still being given despite the high numbers of serious adverse events and deaths? Why are the CEOs of big pharma companies not behind bars for all the disabilities and deaths they caused?

I got the answer from the presentation of Sasha Latypova, COVID-19 countermeasures: Evidence for an intent to harm that she presented at the Pandemic Strategies, Lessons, and Consequences Conference in Stockholm, Sweden, in January 2023. Läkaruppropet organized the vent.

Alexandra “Sasha” Latypova

Sasha Latypova holds an MBA degree and is a former Pharmaceutical R&D Executive. She spent approximately 25 years in the pharmaceutical industry. She has owned and managed several contract research organizations, conducting clinical trials for over 60 pharmaceutical clients worldwide.

Sasha became concerned about the irregularities, cover-up, and apparent fraud relating to the extremely high number of deaths and injuries associated with the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ rollout.

Sasha also has a Substack, Due Diligence, and Art.

In her talk, Sasha cited the work of Katherine Watt, a paralegal with her own substack, Bailiwick News.

Most of my articles about COVID deal with the disease process and jab side effects. Watching Sasha’s presentation and reading Bailiwick News directed me to explore a deep rabbit hole.

For me, it answers the other questions I have about what is happening in our world that seems to be circling the drain.

The material here is from Sasha and Bailiwick News. I added screenshots from the talk and provided links. The presentation follows.

CV19 shots do not follow Good Manufacturing Practice

Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) applies to drugs, foods, and other mass-produced products. The FDA says this about GMP.

Consumers expect that each batch of medicines they take will meet quality standards so that they will be safe and effective.

Flu Adverse events

Below are 30 years of flu vaccine data for all manufacturers. 50% of the population gets the flu shot. The range of serious adverse events per flu vaccine lot is about 1-37 reports per lot number.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

CV shots Adverse Events

In contrast, for the COVID-19 shots, (Janssen, Moderna, and Pfizer lot numbers have 1-1544 serious adverse events per valid lot numbers, as shown below.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

The high numbers of serious adverse events, including deaths in many COVID shots, demonstrate bad manufacturing practices of the CV19 “vaccines.”

Even if the lot sizes are adjusted by the size of the lot and by the number of doses, the story does not change.

Moderna Lot # 041L20A,

A lot number of Moderna, Lot # 041L20A, manufactured on 12/5/2020, was “paused” in Orange County, California, due to excessive numbers of allergic reactions.

However, Moderna, the health authorities, including the CDC and the FDA, did not stop the distribution, and the injections were not stopped.

In fact, the lot number continued to sell all over the US until it ran out in late March.

The image below shows the X axis is the number of serious adverse events and deaths associated with the Moderna Lot # 041L20A. The y-axis (horizontal) is the date of manufacture. Blue is adverse events, and orange is deaths.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

Lot # 041L20A is now associated with 65 deaths in the US and over 3,000 serious adverse events.

If there is Salmonella in salad greens, they will be recalled from all store shelves. That is the proper practice for products but not for CV19 shots. And most recalls are voluntarily done by the producers but not in this situation.

If something like this happens, everything that follows is intentional.

Why No Action By the Regulators or Courts Anywhere in the World?

Sasha collaborated with Katherine Watt of Bailiwick News, and her legal research gave the answer.

You are now entering the rabbit hole.

The EUA, OTA, and PREP Act

What they discovered was a government-pharma-military-criminal cartel, and it is actually operating all over the world.

In the US, they perverted the 1977 Emergency Use Authorization Law, which was defined to be applied to conditions with no alternative treatment and only very severe ones.

However, the EUA was used very broadly, and now it is used for hundreds of products without any evidence of an emergency.

They just went ahead and rolled out the products without any safety or efficacy testing done.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

In addition, the US Department of Defense ordered all these COVID products (vaccines, therapeutics, monoclonal antibodies, diagnostics, and masks. This huge spending was under this contracting framework called the Other Transaction Authority.

Other Transaction Authority (OTA) was implemented in the 1960s only for NASA. Now 11 federal agencies use it.

The DOD is a big user of OTA because it allows them to contract without following federal procurement rules and regulations. They can specifically order from otherwise regulated industries, such as pharma, without following regulations or disclosing any A.P.(?).

It’s a lot of secrecy. They typically use OTA to order weapons from defense contractors. But now they us it for a pharmaceutical products.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

Finally, all the structures click into place when the HHS declares a pandemic or a public health emergency. (Based on 40 cases out of eight billion people in the world)

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Katherine Watt, Bailiwick News On Substack

US, 21 USC 360bbb-3(k)

There is this interesting law in the US, 21 USC 360bbb-3(k), which states that the use of EUA-covered medical countermeasures (MCM) products, once designated as such by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, “shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation.”

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

The significance of this is that if a countermeasure is not a clinical investigation, then no pharmaceutical regulation applies to these countermeasures.

So here is the lie that our government told to us and the world. The same lie was repeated by governments all over the worlds to their citizens.

They were claiming that its a health event. They were claiming that they were producing pharmaceutical products to the good manufacturing standards when they perfectly well knew.

I assure you they are all aware of this, no pharmaceutical regulations apply to these countermeasures.

The word countermeasure has no real clear definition, but once something is designated as a countermeasure, it is no longer categorized as a pharmaceutical.

Note: Bailiwick News has an article about it. “On the significance of 21 USC 360bbb-3(k): “use” of EUA products “shall not constitute a clinical investigation.”

NSC, DOD, and BARDA are in charge of the Pandemic

The US government also lied that this was a health event. When they told us it was a virus from a wet market. In reality, they organized the response to it as if there was war.

That is why the National Security Council was put in charge of the COVID response.

The National Security Council consisting of defense heads and intelligence heads with no healthcare representatives, advises the president. Yet, it became in charge of a so-called health event for some unknown reason.

The decisional role is encircled in red below.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

The pandemic response organizational chart, from page 9 of Pandemic Crisis Action Plan-adapted, 2020 (Pancap-A), shows the NSC is solely responsible for COVID policy.

PANCAP has a link here and starts on page 26.

Operation Warp Speed (OWS)

Below is a slide from the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory
Committee (VRBPPAC) -10.22.20 Meeting Presentation COVID-19 Vaccine Development portfolio.pdf. It shows the organizational chart of Operation Warp Speed.

Those in charge are the National Security Council (NSC), the Department of Defense (DOD), and the Biomedical Advance Research Development and Authority (BARDA).

Notice that the pharma companies are not in charge of vaccine development.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

The link to the source can be found HERE.

In Operation Warp Speed, the government did everything that pharmaceutical companies normally are very sensitive about. Typically, pharmaceutical companies are in charge of designing clinical trials and safety monitoring.

In Operation Warp Speed, the NSC, DOD, and BARDA hired contract research organizations to run them.

As seen on the org chart, they have legislative affairs, so they interact with congress and have an office of the general counsel, the Department of Justice, defending them.

DOJ defends Pfizer

When Pfizer was sued because they did not want to release the clinical data for 75 years. Who was arguing in court on behalf of Pfizer?

Pfizer lawyers were not even in the room. It was the Department of Justice.

So, why is the US government defending a private pharmaceutical company?

The pharmaceutical companies are given a lot of money and told to shut up and follow the orders. Because the DOD and the US government run the whole operation.

Sasha adds that she is not absolving big pharma and agrees they are criminal co-conspirators and should be prosecuted.

Here we have an implemented model of fascism. Government merges with private companies.

In the graphic below, the right-hand side shows established DOD contractors. FOIA released these contracts, going back to at least 2012, maybe earlier.

On the left side are the pharma companies, but if you look closely, they say DEMO or demonstration, which is fake by definition.

On the right-hand side are the real manufacturers of the products.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Https://Www.fda.gov/Media/143560/Download

Addendum Feb. 24, 2023: I found this article by Children’s Health Defense showing that a CIA contractor, Resilience, a gene therapy maker, will be manufacturing the mRNA for the Moderna shots.

Below is another slide from the public event of BARDA, where they bragged about how much money they spent quickly. They spent 4-5 trillion dollars on this. On the right-hand side, you can see that they spent a lot of money on demonstrations.

These words have meaning, and that is what they exactly bought. They bought demonstrations.

Military definition of demonstration: An attack or show of force on a front where a decision is not sought or made to deceive the enemy.

Source: Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Https://Www.medicalcountermeasures.gov/Barda/Barda-Industry-Day-2021/

They spent $47.5 billion on the R&D of these contracts.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

Below are publicly available contracts available at https://www.keionline.org/covid-contracts. This is just a screenshot. There are about 400 contracts there. As you can see, a lot of them say DOD.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Https://Www.keionline.org/Covid-Contracts

The first line says Advanced Technology International (ATI). Below is the website of ATI. It doesn’t seem to be healthcare-related.

They are a long-standing manager of DOD contracts, and they manage it thru OTA, as encircled in red.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

No Liability

The image below shows how PREP ACT promises no liability. It also says that the shots are a dual-use civilian and military product.

It also shows that other countries cannot sue Pfizer. And if the citizens of a country sue Pfizer, then the national government is liable for the injuries and needs to put up state and military assets as collateral.

So if someone asks me, Why would Pfizer want a military base? Because it is not Pfizer but the US government that wants that base.

They also remove national sovereignty by changing their national laws about pharma liability.

Countries are also not allowed to test what is inside the vials. So, until today, we don’t know what is inside the vials.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet,  Due Diligence, And Art.

An example of the contract is below. It shows that the contract asked Pfizer for a large-scale vaccine demonstration.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet, Due Diligence, And Art.

A specific clause about the scope of the project says that pre-clinical, clinical trials, and chemistry manufacturing controls, which are all part of regulatory compliance, are out of the scope of this product.

The government never bought, ordered, or gave them money for it, and there is no way to enforce it. Because they also absolve them from all liabilities thru the PREP Act.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Due Diligence And Art.

The Moderna contract shows that it gives them PREP Act liability clause protection, and this is both a civil and military application.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Due Diligence And Art.

So what happened here is play-acting. They never have to follow those regulations. It is not lawful, and it is not constitutional, but they went ahead and did them in collaboration with the FDA, CDC, and other agencies. And that was to convince the public that it really is a pharmaceutical product when it actually is not.

The clinical trials were never ordered. The Good Manufacturing Compliance was never ordered. And legally speaking, there were no clinical trial subjects or investigators because if there is no clinical investigational product, then there is no investigation.

So what the FDA and global regulatory leadership did was impersonate the regulators. So that you will fall for this lie and get injected.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

Finally, Pfizer already invoked this as their legal defense in the Brook Jackson case in the US. Brook sued Pfizer under the False Claims Act, and that they defrauded the government.

Pfizer already filed a motion to dismiss the case, but it has not been dismissed yet. But Pfizer already in court states that judge, please dismiss this case.

We did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered. 

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Läkaruppröpet

Comment

I had to read more to confirm what Sasha said. Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Meryl Nass, who were at the same conference, agreed with her.

Earlier, I mentioned the military definition of demonstration as an attack or show of force on a front where a decision is not sought or made to deceive the enemy.

Who is the enemy?

The world’s citizens, you and me, are considered the enemy. Katherine Watt presented the image in her article, LEGAL WALLS of the COVID-19 KILL BOX.

Evidence Of Intent To Harm
Source: Legal Walls Of The Covid-19 Kill Box

The weapons used against us are the following:

All are used to wage war on individuals, families, and communities. You can probably add more.

But don’t despair. There are solutions. Dr. Meryl Nass talked about it.

In the English language, there is a powerful word: NO. Say No to unlawful mandates, masking, vaccines, and everything else that is not moral and decent.

Truth heals. Lies kill. Don’t Get Sick!

Knowledge about Covid-19 is rapidly evolving. Stay current by subscribing. Feel free to share and like.

Follow me on Gettr, Truth Social, Gab, Parler, Twitter, Facebook, and Telegram.

If you find value in this website, please consider buying a coffee to show your support.

Related articles from the Pandemic Conference

  1. Pandemic Lessons and Solutions
  2. Genetic changes by the mRNA shots can be passed to future generations
  3. Turbo Cancers after the COVID shots
  4. New and Alarming Autopsy Findings after the COVID shots

Further readings:

 

© 2018 – 2023 Asclepiades Medicine, LLC. All Rights Reserved
DrJesseSantiano.com does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.