Scrutinize what you see on the internet

A circulating “report” on the internet about a “doctor” who identified graphene, parasites, and heavy metals in all four COVID vaccines.

Allegedly, the “investigator” used Optical Microscopy, Bright-Field Microscopy, Phase Contrast Microscopy, Dark-Field Microscopy, UV absorbance, Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy, X-ray Diffractometer, and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments.

These are my questions?

1. Who are the co-authors in the study? In this type of study, there are usually different authors from different specialties. It is rare that a single person has the expertise to use all of these complex instruments. Most of the time, studies of this sort are multi-institutional so that the findings can be cross-referenced and discussed before they are published.
2. What institutions, government agencies, or universities housed the instruments used? The instruments mentioned are worth millions of dollars. It is not something you get from Amazon or from “Rent-an-electron-microscope.”
3. Who are the entomologist that helped identified the parasites?
4. Where is the bibliography or references of the report?
5. What journal is this report published? Any peer-reviews?
6. Who is the author? You may want to check the internet about him.

Surprisingly, the so-called report got some traction on the internet. I even heard a doctor being interviewed in a podcase quoting this “study.”

I don’t think I’m asking too much. There should be transparency in all scientific claims, especially if the results are fantastic.

If you repeat this wrong information to others, it can affect your own credibility.

Knowledge about Covid-19 is rapidly evolving. Information may update as new studies are made. Stay current by subscribing. Feel free to share and like.

Don’t Get Sick!

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.