Evidences of splicing shows SARS-CoV-2 is man made

Posted on by Jesse Santiano, M.D.

The study, Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2, provides evidence that the virus that caused COVID-19 is artificial.

In nature, viruses change by getting nucleotide sequences from another virus.  The nucleotide sequences are in different lengths. Some are short, and some are long.

In this study, the nucleotide sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 are regular in length compared to other coronaviruses. The lengths were defined by identifying traces of nucleotide splicing for BsaI/BsmBI commonly used in a laboratory.

The SARS-CoV-2 BsaI/BsmBI map has five sites creating six rather regularly-spaced fragments. The receptor binding domain of the Spike protein is entirely within the 5th fragment.

Evidences Of Splicing Shows Sars-Cov-2 Is Man Made

Source: A synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2

The image above is from Alex Washburne’s Substack post, A synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2. Mr. Washburne is one of the study’s authors.

Notice that the RaTG13, the bat coronavirus that is the supposed origin of SARS-CoV-2, is included in the list (fourth from the top).

Considering all the evidence in their study, the odds that the mutations happened naturally in SARS-CoV-2 is 1/250 to 1/100 million.

Sources:

  1. https://alexwasburne.substack.com/p/a-synthetic-origin-of-sars-cov-2
  2. Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2
    Valentin Bruttel, Alex Washburne, Antonius VanDongen
    bioRxiv 2022.10.18.512756; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.18.512756

 

2 Replies to “Evidences of splicing shows SARS-CoV-2 is man made”

  1. Surprised to see an ad on your site promoting Covid vaccinations. Brings into question the veracity of your comments. I do appreciate your references.

    1. I don’t have control on what ads they put on my site. Thanks for letting me know.

Comments are closed.