The FDA approved Pfizer COVID-19 shots for babies and toddlers, and that is wrong!

In their infinite wisdom, The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) of the Food and Drug Administration approved the COVID-19 shots for babies older than six months and children up to five years old.

I will tell you three reasons why that decision is not in the best interest of babies and little kids. COVID-19 does not produce severe illness and is not fatal to little children. Because of that fact, the clinical trials for the Moderna and Pfizer shots have to be fudged using substitute endpoints and reported with misleading statistics.

Lastly, the Food and Drug Administration‘s decision is not science-based.

Infants and those less than five have a low risk of severe COVID-19.

Vaccines are produced against deadly and debilitating infections like smallpox, rabies, and polio. The following studies show mild COIVVD_19 in children from reputable institutions, published in top-tier journals.

The American Academy of Pediatrics summary is current. Cumulative data on June 9, 2022. shows only 0.00%-0.02% of all child COVID-19 cases resulted in the death
The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control studied 820,404 symptomatic COVID-19 in children among ten EU members -only 1.2% were hospitalized, 0.08% required intensive care, and only 0.01% died.
A study from England published in the British Medical Journal showed no excess deaths in children during the pandemic year 2020. – All-cause mortality rates were similar during lockdown compared with the period before lockdown in 2020 and a similar period in 2019
Research that includes the US, UK, Italy, Germany, Spain, France, and Korea showed that COVID-19 deaths per 100,000 among 0-10 years old is 0.03. Table here.
Even during the early phase of the pandemic, when the deadlier Wuhan strain was dominant, China’s CDC showed zero deaths among those less than nine years old. Their study was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association
A Case Western Reserve University paper about children under five infected with the Delta and Omicron variant compared hospitalization, intensive care admission, and mechanical ventilation but did not report any deaths. Why? The authors explained, — “Mortality risks were not reported in this study because so few deaths occurred within three days of infection in both cohorts.”
A study from Harvard found that “childhood mortality rates from COVID-19 are considerably lower than from other diseases like influenza and pneumonia, with the best relative protection achieved at the youngest ages.
Source:
. 2021 Aug 18;13(16):19954-19962.
doi: 10.18632/aging.203442. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
A paper from Nature shows that the Infection Fatality Rate among 0-4 years old is less than 0.01. see below.

Source: Age-specific mortality and immunity patterns of SARS-CoV-2. *Nature* **volume 590**, pages140–145 (2021)

The vaccine studies are not acceptable.

Vaccines released under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization guidelines must be at least 50% effective.

If the risk of dying from COVID-19 among children is very low at 0.03, how can Pfizer and Moderna make a vaccine trial that shows that their vaccine is more effective in preventing deaths?

They can’t. That is why Moderna and Pfizer had to use surrogate endpoints. They measure antibodies instead of COVID-19 deaths.

The same neutralizing antibodies that wane after a few months in adults. That is why they recommend boosters. Talk about recurring income.

Did Moderna meet the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization standard of 50% efficacy?

According to Moderna’s KidCOVE study,

Using the Phase 3 COVE study COVID-19 definition, vaccine efficacy in children six months to 2 years was 43.7%, and vaccine efficacy was 37.5% in the 2 to under six age group.

It is less than 50% effective!

If a doctor tells you, You have a mild disease that you will recover from. But, I would like you to take this less than 50% effective pill. The only thing is that it can potentially kill you. How will you answer?

Pfizer’s three-dose regimen for children 6 to 5 has an 80.3% vaccine efficacy. Their press release state, “Vaccine efficacy, a secondary endpoint in this trial, was 80.3% in children six months to under five years of age.”

Do you remember when the mass media reported that Pfizer was 96% effective? They used the term “vaccine efficacy” too at that time. Now, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is vaccinated, has COVID-19.

Vaccine efficacy sounds impressive because it has high numbers. It is an industry term for Relative Risk and is used to compare vaccines in research. It has nothing to do with a person’s protection against infection.

Absolute Risk Reduction is what we need to hear from the vaccine companies. Know more about Absolute Risk Reduction at:

The Absolute Risk Reduction of the Pfizer Biontech Booster Shot

Absolute Risk Reduction of the COVID-19 Vaccines. Part 2

The FDA’s reasons for approval are based on emotion

So why did the FDA approve the jabs?

The Defender reports,

Many of the committee members, including pediatrician Dr. Ofer Levy, said the decision to authorize the shots was about providing a choice to parents who wanted access to COVID-19 vaccines, despite concerns by public commenters the panel was not adhering to the requirements for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and that authorization would eventually lead to mandates — as it did with adult vaccines.

“I know that the death rate from COVID and young children may not be extremely high,” said Dr. Jay Portnoy, professor of pediatrics at Children’s Mercy Hospital in Kansas City, Missouri. “It’s absolutely terrifying to parents to have their child be sick.”

Portnoy said there are “so many parents who are absolutely desperate to get this vaccine,” and he thinks the committee “owes it to them to give them the choice.”

Excuse me, but what happened to the adults in the FDA?

Doctors, including the head-honchos at the FDA, should be at the forefront of educating people about the risks and benefits of any intervention.

If a parent wants alcohol and drugs for their little child, will the FDA allow them now?

The risks of these gene therapy shots seen in older populations like myocarditis, antibody-dependent enhancement, abnormal blood clot formation, joint problems, and deaths can also happen in these children.

How can a baby or toddler complain about those symptoms? They will indeed be labeled a “fussy baby” and misdiagnosed.

We will see a rise in the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and the Sudden Unexplained Death in Childhood statistics. It already has happened to Sudden Adult Death Syndrome.

Many have been coerced into getting gene therapy shots due to work or school. Little children don’t have to do those.

I don’t tell people what to do with their children. I present data to help people can make better decisions. Just keep in mind that all choices have consequences. Many are irreversible.

Truth heals. Lies kill. Don’t Get Sick!

Knowledge about Covid-19 is rapidly evolving. Stay current by subscribing. Feel free to share and like.

Please consider donating to show your support if you find value in this website.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

COVID-19 in children 0-17 years old have low a risk of death and hospitalization

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
				1	2	3
4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11	12	13	14	15	16	17
18	19	20	21	22	23	24
25	26	27	28	29	30