The following is a segment of a reprint of Dr. Russell Blaylock’s article on Surgical Neurology International. For someone like me who has followed COVID-19 from the very beginning, I agree with him 100%.
The original article is more than 9000 words long and could be challenging to read. I changed the format, and added emphasis, links, and subtitles.
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream led by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies.[3,6,57]
Practicing medicine without a license
We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients, and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence.
For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators, and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience-based information but rather to force the acceptance of particular forms of care and “prevention”—including remdesivir, use of respirators and ultimately a series of essentially untested messenger RNA vaccines.
For the first time in history, medical treatment protocols are not being formulated based on the experience of the physicians treating the largest number of patients successfully, but rather individuals and bureaucracies that have never treated a single patient—including Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, EcoHealth Alliance, the CDC, WHO, state public health officers and hospital administrators.[23,38]
Medical tyranny
The media (TV, newspapers, magazines, etc.), medical societies, state medical boards, and the owners of social media have appointed themselves to be the sole source of information concerning this so-called “pandemic.”
Websites have been removed, highly credentialed and experienced clinical doctors and scientific experts in the field of infectious diseases have been demonized, careers have been destroyed, and all dissenting information has been labeled “misinformation” and “dangerous lies,” even when sourced from top experts in the fields of virology, infectious diseases, pulmonary critical care, and epidemiology.
Demonization of truth
These blackouts of truth occur even when this information is backed by extensive scientific citations from some of the most qualified medical specialists in the world.[23] Incredibly, even individuals, such as Dr. Michael Yeadon, a retired ex-Chief Scientist and vice-president for the science division of Pfizer Pharmaceutical company in the UK, who charged the company with making a dangerous vaccine, are ignored and demonized. Further, he and other highly qualified scientists have stated that no one should take this vaccine.
Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most cited experts in his field, has successfully treated over 2000 COVID patients by using a protocol of early treatment (which the so-called experts wholly ignored) but has been the victim of a particularly vicious assault by those benefiting financially from the vaccines. He has published his results in peer-reviewed journals, reporting an 80% reduction in hospitalizations and a 75% reduction in deaths by using early treatment.[44] Despite this, he is under an unrelenting series of attacks by the information controllers, none of which have treated a single patient.
Neither Anthony Fauci, the CDC, WHO, nor any governmental medical establishment has ever offered any early treatment other than Tylenol, hydration, and calling an ambulance once you have difficulty breathing. This is unprecedented in the history of medical care, as early treatment of infections is critical to saving lives and preventing severe complications.
Not only have these medical organizations and federal lapdogs not even suggested early treatment, but they also attacked anyone who attempted to initiate such therapy with all the weapons at their disposal—loss of license, removal of hospital privileges, shaming, destruction of reputations, and even arrest.[2]
An excellent example of this outrage against freedom of speech and providing informed consent information is the recent suspension by the medical board in Maine of Dr. Meryl Nass’ medical license and the ordering of her to undergo a psychiatric evaluation for prescribing Ivermectin and sharing her expertise in this field.[9,65]
I know Dr. Nass personally and can vouch for her integrity, brilliance, and dedication to truth. Her scientific credentials are impeccable. This behavior by a medical licensing board is reminiscent of the methodology of the Soviet KGB during the period when dissidents were incarcerated in psychiatric gulags to silence their dissent.
OTHER UNPRECEDENTED ATTACKS
Another unprecedented tactic is to remove dissenting doctors from their positions as journal editors and reviewers and retract their scientific papers from journals, even after they have been in print. Until this pandemic event, I have never seen so many journal papers being retracted— the vast majority promoting alternatives to official dogma, especially if the papers question vaccine safety.
Normally a submitted paper or study is reviewed by experts in the field, called peer review. These reviews can be pretty intense and nit-picking in detail, insisting that all errors within the paper be corrected before publication. So, unless fraud or some other major hidden problem is discovered after the paper is in print, the paper remains in the scientific literature.
Ghost Writers for Medical Journals
We are now witnessing a growing number of excellent scientific papers written by top experts in the field being retracted from major medical and scientific journals weeks, months, and even years after publication. A careful review indicates that in far too many instances, the authors dared question accepted dogma by the controllers of scientific publications—especially concerning the safety, alternative treatments, or efficacy of vaccines.[12,63]
These journals rely on extensive adverting by pharmaceutical companies for their revenue. Several instances have occurred where powerful pharmaceutical companies exerted their influence on owners of these journals to remove articles that in any way question these companies’ products.[13,34,35]
Worse still is the actual designing of medical articles for promoting drugs and pharmaceutical products that involve fake studies, so-called ghostwritten articles.[49,64] Richard Horton is quoted by the Guardian as saying, “journals have devolved into information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical industry.”[13,63] Proven fraudulent “ghostwritten” articles sponsored by pharmaceutical giants have appeared regularly in top clinical journals, such as JAMA and New England Journal of Medicine—never to be removed despite proven scientific abuse and manipulation of data.[49,63]
Ghostwritten articles involve planning companies whose job is to design articles containing manipulated data to support a pharmaceutical product and then have these articles accepted by high-impact clinical journals, that is, the journals most likely to affect the clinical decision-making of doctors.
Further, they supply doctors in clinical practice with free reprints of these manipulated articles. The Guardian found 250 companies engaged in this ghostwriting business. The final step in designing these articles for publication in the most prestigious journals is to recruit well-recognized medical experts from prestigious institutions to add their names to these articles. These recruited medical authors are either paid upon agreeing to add their name to these pre-written articles, or they do so for the prestige of having their name on an article in a prestigious medical journal.[11]
Of vital importance is the observation by experts in the field of medical publishing that nothing has been done to stop this abuse. Medical ethicists have lamented that because of this widespread practice, “you can’t trust anything.”
Conflict of Interests
While some journals insist on disclosing information, most doctors reading these articles ignore or excuse it. Several journals make disclosure more difficult by requiring the reader to find the disclosure statements at another location. Many periodicals do not police such words, and omissions by authors are common and without punishment.
Continued on Part 2
Truth heals. Lies kill. Don’t Get Sick!
Knowledge about Covid-19 is rapidly evolving. Stay current by subscribing. Feel free to share and like.
If you find value in this website, please consider donating to show your support.
Related:
- COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth? Part 1 – Many went wrong
- COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth? Part 2 – Big pharma, mandates, and denial of treatment
- COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth? Part 3 – Masks, Fact checks, Mistreating the unvaxxed
- COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth? Part 4 – Nothing made sense
- COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth? Part 5 – COVID “vaccines”
- COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth? Part 6 – Deadly vaccine lots
- COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth? Part 7 – Autopsies
- COVID UPDATE: What is the Truth? Part 8 – The lies and the aftermath
Reference: Blaylock RL. COVID UPDATE: What is the truth? Surg Neurol Int 2022;13:167.
© 2018 – 2022 Asclepiades Medicine, L.L.C. All Rights Reserved
DrJesseSantiano.com does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment