A study compared the mortality risks of COVID-19 mRNA and vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccinees.
However, examining the paper’s data shows increased cardiovascular mortality among recipients of the COVID mRNA shots.
The study obtained the data for the mRNA vaccines” from the Pfizer, Moderna, and CureVac COVID-19 trials.
For the adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 jabs, info from the AstraZeneca, Janssen (Johnson and Johnson), Sputnik V, and CanSino (Convidencia) studies were used.
Their abstract shows that the overall risk of dying of the vector-based shots vaccinees was lower than the recipients of the mRNA shots.
The summary of the findings is reproduced below.
We examined the possible non-specific effects of novel mRNA- and adenovirus-vector COVID-19 vaccines by reviewing the randomized control trials (RCTs) of mRNA and adenovirus-vector COVID-19 vaccines.
We calculated mortality risk ratios (RRs) for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines vs. placebo recipients and compared them with the RR for adenovirus-vector COVID-19 vaccine recipients vs. controls.
The RR for overall mortality of mRNA vaccines vs. placebo was 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63–1.71).
In the adenovirus-vector vaccine RCTs, the RR for overall mortality was 0.37 (0.19–0.70).
The two vaccine types differed significantly with respect to impact on overall mortality (p = 0.015).
The RCTs of COVID-19 vaccines were unblinded rapidly, and controls were vaccinated. The results may therefore not be representative of the long-term effects.
However, the data argue for performing RCTs of mRNA and adenovirus-vector vaccines head-to-head comparing long-term effects on overall mortality.
The tables show the higher cardiovascular mortality in the Pfizer (1.5) and Moderna (1.4) mRNA shots, as I highlighted below.
A relative risk value of more than one means that the likelihood of dying in the treatment group (mRNA vaccinees) is higher compared to the control (unvaccinated) group.
The cardiovascular deaths that were reported are the following by Pfizer. The quotations are from the study.
- “Myocardial infarction” (N = 2)
- “Hypertensive heart disease” (N = 1)
- “Hemorrhage stroke” (N = 1)
- “Cardiorespiratory arrest” (N = 2)
- “Cardiac failure congestive” (N = 1)
- “Cardiac arrest” (N = 5)
- “Arteriosclerosis” (N = 2);
- “Aortic rupture” (N = 1).
Moderna reported their cardiovascular deaths as:
- “Myocardial infarction” (N = 5)
- “Cardiopulmonary arrest” (N = 3)
- “End-stage congestive heart failure” (N = 1)
- “Cardiac arrest” (N = 1)
- “Provisional diagnosis, sudden fatal event, likely myocardial infarction” (N = 1)
- “Death suspected due to coronary heart disease, probably due to complications of diabetes mellitus” (N = 1).
During the pandemic, there was a race among drug companies to release the first vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. The winner can corner a global market of people deathly afraid of COVID-19. Thanks to mass media and the suppression of effective and inexpensive medicines like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
At stake are billions of dollars in government contracts. If they make a vaccine trial, would they recruit subjects that are at risk of dying in the next few months? Of course, they won’t!
That is why they recruited healthy people below the age of 65, which is one of the criticisms of the COVID-19 vaccine trials.
Younger, relatively low cardiac risk participants have a lower risk of “dying suddenly”. By doing so, they can conclude that their product is “safe.”
So if the recruits are healthy upon recruitment, what caused them to die in a matter of months after the mRNA injection?
Other striking items to me are the “Non-accident, non-COVID-19 relative risk mortality” in the Pfizer group of 1.27 and the “Accident mortality” in the Moderna of 2.0
The (c) footnote said that three deaths were due to suicide (2) and head trauma (1). I find it hard to believe that three people who were health-conscious enough to participate in an experimental vaccine trial would later commit suicide.
Are the cause of death from the death certificates or the Pfizer and Moderna authors?
Is the head trauma due to a fall after a neurological (stroke) or a cardiovascular event like a cardiac arrhythmia?
Additionally, although the relative risk shows higher cardiovascular deaths among the mRNA injection recipients, I presume these data are already “sanitized.” I have no proof, but if billions of dollars are at stake, psychopaths would have no second thoughts about doing that.
Going to the randomized-controlled trials of the adenovirus-vector vaccines, the combined overall, cardiovascular, and accident mortalities are 0.37, 0.065, and 0.69, respectively, as shown in Table 2 of the study.
Looking at the relative risk numbers, they are much better than the mRNA shots. However, I can’t forget that the term Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT) was coined due to the complications of the AstraZeneca shots.
VITT leads to cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and splanchnic vein thrombosis among AstraZeneca and Johnson and Johnson recipients. They have also been reported in Pfizer and Moderna.
I wrote about VITT in — Know the Signs of Vaccine Induced Blood Clotting
This article explains the excess deaths seen after the rollout of the mRNA shots.
- The Most Complete Measure of Excess Deaths
- Excess Deaths in a Small Parish
- Cardiac Arrhythmias Explain Excess Deaths
- The Rise in Deaths Among Canadian Doctors
- Lincoln National Insurance paid out 163% more for deaths of working people ages 18-64 in 2021
- Pfizer COVID shot Lot Numbers with the most deaths
- Excess deaths continue in 2022
- Excess Deaths in Scotland 2021
- More COVID jabbed dead from COVID-19 than the unvaxxed in Scotland
- Above-average deaths of 5 to 74 years old for the year 2021
- US data: High numbers of autopsies done in 2021 among 15-64 years old.
- CDC data shows higher deaths from 25-54 years old in 2021 compared to 2018-2020
- 145 countries with higher COVID-19 cases and deaths after the COVID shots
- Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
- Vaccine-induced deaths in the US and Europe are way higher than the CDC reports!
- German Analysis: The Higher the Vaccination Rate, the Higher the Excess Mortality
In summary, this article shows that it pays to look at the data and tables of studies to find hidden information that you will not see in the paper’s abstract.
Truth heals. Lies kill. Don’t Get Sick!
Knowledge about Covid-19 is rapidly evolving. Stay current by subscribing. Feel free to share and like.
Follow me on Gettr, Truth Social, Gab, Parler, Twitter, Facebook, Follow, and Telegram.
If you find value in this website, please consider buying a coffee to show your support.
Related:
- Four ways the spike protein rapidly forms blood clots resistant to breakdown
- Two More Ways the Spike Proteins Produce Abnormal Blood Clots
- RNA splice study shows why AstraZeneca and Janssen jabs are clot shots
- COVID shots cause a 25% increase in cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome in those under 40 years old
- Kaiser Permanente study shows myopericarditis is 43 times higher than VAERS reports
- Higher blood pressure after COVID shots and why it happens
- Study shows spike proteins affect cardiac pericytes
- Kounis syndrome can explain vaccine-related heart attacks
- Circulation: Myocarditis related to COVID-19 shots in teenagers and young adults
- Anti-Idiotype Antibodies against the Spike Proteins may Explain Myocarditis
- mRNA Vaccination Increases the Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Myocarditis after mRNA Vaccination in the Military
- Myocarditis and the COVID vaccine
- This study shows Ten Fold risk of Developing Blood Clots after the COVID Vaccines.
- Platelet Changes Cause Blood Clots in COVID-19
- The High Risk of Deadly Brain Clots in the J & J COVID Vaccine
- Aortic Dissection after the Pfizer injection
Reference:
Benn et al. Randomized clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines: Do adenovirus-vector vaccines have beneficial non-specific effects? Cell. VOLUME 26, ISSUE 5, 106733, MAY 19, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106733
© 2018 – 2023 Asclepiades Medicine, LLC. All Rights Reserved
DrJesseSantiano.com does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.